Science and the Arts

Enacting the bridge between Plant Science and the Arts takes some courage. For one thing, not everyone appreciates the value of transdisciplinarity. Even worse, to most it’s a single-track road: Artists, best-case scenario, benefit or find inspiration in botanical works. Seldom the opposite direction is travelled. And yet Science, writ large, can be particularly stimulated by artistic talent. Real science doesn’t reduce to the (cartoon) ABC of the scientific method so often parroted from the pulpits of orthodox Academia. And plant science is not unlike other fields of research. It can only flourish with imagination. .

Microcosms: A Homage to Sacred Plants of the Americas

Ars Technica

Questioning Hierarchies Between Art and Science

MINT Lab Videos

Welcome to the MINT Lab

What is the MINT Lab? And what do we do here?

Planta Sapiens & Human Impatience: Are we patient enough to learn how smart plants are?

Plants have long been deemed passive organisms with “hardwired” or “inflexible” behavior. However, a growing body of empirical research reveals that plants exhibit cognitive capabilities traditionally attributed to animals. And yet, controversies over these scientific findings have recently intensified.

In this talk, Paco Calvo reflected on the current challenges faced by the field of plant signaling and behavior, including risks of underdelivering and strategies to avoid biases that may lead to overinterpreting results.

Planta Sapiens, Homo Stupidus

Who is the smart one?

Understanding Plant Intelligence

A Conversation with Paco Calvo & Natalie Larence

The Surprises of Diverse Intelligences

Scientists are discovering a surprising array of diverse intelligences across the universe. This video offers a look into findings from recent research about animal intelligence, and explores new ways of framing how we think about plant and cellular intelligences.

Quotes

If you root yourself in the ground, you can afford to be stupid. But if you move, you must have mechanisms for moving, and mechanisms to ensure that the movement is not utterly arbitrary and independent of what is going on outside.

Patricia Churchland

2002, Brain-wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy

The environment of plants, organisms that lack sense organs and muscles, is not relevant in the study of perception and behavior. We shall treat the vegetation of the world as animals do, as if it were lumped together with the inorganic minerals of the world, with the physical, chemical, and geological environment. Plants in general are not animate; they do not move about, they do not behave, they lack a nervous system, and they do not have sensations.

J.J. Gibson

1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception

During one of my many discussions with my late friend the neurobiologist Francisco Varela, we talked about what it is that distinguishes sentient forms of life from plant forms of life. As I recall, he suggested as a criterion “an entity’s ability to move itself from here to there,” or words to that effect. If an organism can move its whole body from one place to another to escape danger and survive, or to obtain food and to reproduce, then it may be regarded as a sentient being.

The Dalai Lama

2011, Beyond Religion

Podcasts

The MINT Lab is featured in a number of podcasts, covering topics such as plant intelligence, theory of mind and much more!